Brands over time

Oxfam
over time

Every year keeps its colour across every chart.│ ChatGPT, 30 Nov 2022

201 of Oxfam's own blog posts, press releases and announcements, 2015 to 2026, measured sentence by sentence, 42 of them recovered from the Internet Archive. How the writing has moved over the years, how it compares with 9 other charities, and what it sounds like in its own words.

Pages measured
201
Years covered
2015–26
Archived before ChatGPT
42
Blog · press
66 · 135

01 · Homepage

One capture a year

Oxfam's homepage from 2000 to 2026, closest to 1 July, from the Internet Archive. Pick a year or press play. Each headline is quoted from its capture and links to the archived copy.

2026oxfam.org.uk1 Jul 2026
Oxfam homepage, 1 Jul 2026

Screenshot of Oxfam’s homepage (oxfam.org.uk) as archived by the Internet Archive on 1 Jul 2026. © Oxfam or its licensors. Shown for comparison and review; not endorsed by Oxfam.

Homepage

2026

“Together for a fairer world”

Page title

Oxfam GB | leading UK charity fighting global poverty

Open on the Internet Archive
  1. 2008Poverty – the great struggle of our times
  2. 2011The System's bust. Donate £5 a month or join the movement to fix the system.
  3. 2015Oxfam's Online Shop
  4. 2017We can't do it without you
  5. 2021We are Oxfam
  6. 2026Together for a fairer world

26 captures. Screenshots are rendered from the archive and can pull in images archived later than the page itself; dates come from the capture. Years without a capture are greyed out in the strip.

02 · Measures by year

How the writing moved

Every year’s pages, averaged. Pick a measure. Hatched bars rest on fewer than 10 pages: context, not a finding. The page count sits under each year.

Sentence lengthAverage words per sentence.
8
16
24
Charities avg 13.4
21.5
9.8
8.1
9.3
16.8
18.1
17.0
13.3
17.3
15.7
17.1
ChatGPT · Nov 2022
20152 pp
20163 pp
20171 pp
2018no pages
20197 pp
20205 pp
202122 pp
202214 pp
20231 pp
20246 pp
20254 pp
20261 pp
10 or more pagesFewer than 10 pages: context, not a findingSector averageChatGPT released
Show as a table
YearSentence lengthPages
201521.52
20169.83
20178.11
20199.37
202016.85
202118.122
202217.014
202313.31
202417.36
202515.74
202617.11

Years with pages: 2015 (2), 2016 (3), 2017 (1), 2019 (7), 2020 (5), 2021 (22), 2022 (14), 2023 (1), 2024 (6), 2025 (4), 2026 (1). Dates come from page metadata, structured data, the URL, or the month a page was first archived (a latest possible date).

03 · Before and after

2019 to Nov 2022 against 2024 to 2026

The same measures on 48 pages from before ChatGPT launched and 11 pages from 2024 on. A change here is a change in style. It does not show how any page was written: people used every one of these words and shapes long before 2022, and SGR-011 found most of the shift across brands was a trend already under way.

Measure2019 to Nov 2022 · 48 pp2024 to 2026 · 11 ppChange
Sentence length
16.416.7+2%
Sentence rhythm
0.720.76+6%
Contractions
9.915.0+51%
"You"
17%11%−6 pts
"We"
71%90%+19 pts
Questions
0.90.1−89%
Exclamations
0.390.00−100%
Long words
26%28%+2 pts
Em dashes
2.195.04+131%
AI-associated words
0.440.64+43%
AI-era marketing words
0.270.00−100%
Quieter LLM-favoured words
0.641.45+128%
AI-associated sentence shapes
0.350.06−82%
Page length
726526−28%

Each row is scaled to its own larger value, so rows compare within themselves, not with each other. Before = 2019 to Nov 2022 (48 pages); after = 2024 to 2026 (11 pages). Method: SGR-011.

04 · Against its sector

Oxfam among charities

Each dot is one brand’s mean across all its measured pages; the tick is the sector average. Only brands with 10 or more measured pages are shown or counted. Select a dot to open that brand.

  1. Questions

    59% less than its sector

    0.8 against a sector average of 2.1; 2nd lowest of 9.

  2. "You"

    49% less than its sector

    17% against a sector average of 33%; 2nd lowest of 9.

  3. Em dashes

    43% more than its sector

    2.43 against a sector average of 1.70; 2nd highest of 9.

Sentence length2nd highest of 9
Oxfam 15.4
10.317.3
ContractionsMid-table, 4th of 9
Oxfam 12.0
4.622.1
"You"2nd lowest of 9
Oxfam 17%
15%49%
"We"2nd highest of 9
Oxfam 69%
39%71%
Questions2nd lowest of 9
Oxfam 0.8
0.03.8
Long words3rd highest of 9
Oxfam 27%
23%30%
Em dashes2nd highest of 9
Oxfam 2.43
0.482.90
AI-associated wordsHighest of 9
Oxfam 0.86
0.040.86
ExclamationsMid-table, 5th of 9
Oxfam 0.43
0.190.88
Page length3rd lowest of 9
Oxfam 707
6341,479

Pages measured: Cancer Research UK 133 · Oxfam 201 · British Red Cross 315 · Macmillan Cancer Support 290 · RNLI 35 · NSPCC 174 · Barnardo's 298 · Mind 228 · Save the Children 317 · RSPCA 3. Measures and method: SGR-010; the brand list and sectors come from SGR-009.

05 · Vocabulary

Words Oxfam uses more than its peers

The words this brand reaches for more often than the rest of its sector. This is subject matter more than voice.

climate64.0 vs 7.3
inequality17.4 vs 1.0
water33.2 vs 6.1
wealth18.6 vs 0.3
vaccine18.4 vs 2.2
fashion12.7 vs 0.5
rich12.6 vs 0.4
emissions14.5 vs 0.1
tax9.7 vs 0.4
sustainable12.4 vs 1.5
second-hand9.4 vs 0.2
OxfamSector peers

Uses per 10,000 words, ranked by weighted log-odds (Monroe et al. 2008) across 201 pages. Checked for product names and page furniture.

06 · In its own words

What it sounded like

Openings of real pages, quoted word for word, oldest first. Each links to the page, or to the Internet Archive’s copy when it has gone.

2017Sep · AnnouncementArchived copy
“The world's favourite fictional Finnish family, The Moomins, represented by Moomin Characters Ltd, and Oxfam have today announced a new partnership to help women and girls around the world fight inequality and escape poverty for good.”
Oxfam GB :: leading UK charity fighting global poverty
2016Jun · BlogArchived copy
“A number of Oxfam supporters were invited to our Head Office in Oxford on 21st May to come and hear about Oxfam's work from some experts on the key areas of Oxfam: water, women, work and inequality and meet other supporters from across the country.”
Inspirational Speakers at Oxfam Inspires

07 · Every page

All 217 pages, by year

The full list behind every number above, with links to the live page or the archived copy. 201 count towards the measures; the rest were not measured (3 pdf report (annual report, info pack), 13 mostly short lines (lists, tables, link pages) rather than prose). Pages with no reliable date count in the overall numbers but in no year.

20261 page
20254 pages
20246 pages
20231 page
202214 pages
202122 pages
20205 pages
20197 pages
20171 page
20163 pages
20152 pages
In the overall numbers, no year135 pages
Not measured16 pages

08 · Method

How this was measured

The pages

Oxfam's own blog posts, press releases and announcements, fetched from the live site in 2026 and from the Internet Archive for 2015 to November 2022. Homepages are shown as captures; product and help pages are not measured.

The measures

Code counts from ScriptGrain’s writing instruments: sentence length and rhythm, contractions, pronouns, punctuation, long words, and three published lists of AI-associated words. No AI model reads or judges any page.

What it cannot say

These measures describe style. They cannot tell who or what wrote a page, and nothing here says or implies that any brand used AI to write.

Sample sizes

Every number carries its page count. Years under 10 pages, and before-and-after comparisons with under 10 pages on a side, are shown as context only.

Sentence length
Average words per sentence.
Sentence rhythm
How much sentence length varies (standard deviation over mean). Higher reads less even.
Contractions
Contractions (we're, you'll, it's) per 1,000 words. A rough gauge of how conversational the writing is.
"You"
Share of I/we/you pronouns that are "you": how much the writing addresses the reader.
"We"
Share of I/we/you pronouns that are "we": how much the writing talks about the organisation.
Questions
Question marks per 1,000 words.
Exclamations
Exclamation marks per 1,000 words.
Long words
Share of words with seven or more letters.
Em dashes
Em dashes per 1,000 words.
AI-associated words
Words from SGR-007's three AI-associated lists, per 1,000 words. These are style markers that people used long before ChatGPT; a higher rate says nothing about who or what wrote the page.
AI-era marketing words
Marketing words that became more common in AI-era copy (seamless, elevate, unlock...), per 1,000 words. A style measure only.
Quieter LLM-favoured words
Everyday words language models are known to over-use, per 1,000 words. A style measure only.
AI-associated sentence shapes
Sentence patterns such as "not just X, but Y", found by ScriptGrain's cliche checker, per 1,000 words. A style measure only.
Page length
Average words per page.

Studies: SGR-009: Do brands in the same sector sound the same? · SGR-010: How UK brands write · SGR-011: Did brand writing change after ChatGPT?.